This is an interesting argument. I think the argument could be made using Breaking Bad as well. I think that show is quite good at showing how easy it is to extrapolate blame and internalize merit in a system in which one has more structurally-supplied control (knowledge, power, capacity for/benefits from but distance from the tools of group violence). I found the discourse around Breaking Bad very interesting for the ideas it unpacked and the emotions it unleashed when used to critique concepts. I think a similar argument could also be made using Bridgerton (I tried to make it anyways) and using Edtech today (again, I tried to make this after a Nigerian colleague and I reviewed a UNESCO report on edtech and who actually benefits from the relevant platforms. We discussed how having the capacity to take online classes from name-brand universities did not alter on-the-ground access to the jobs/network/salaries actual physical attendance to these universities afforded students 'lucky' enough to attend them in person.) Constructs are very powerful, and unpacking them is very helpful. My colleagues and I have a joke that we use often: Q: 'What's the difference between privilege and vulnerability?' A: 'Context.'