I find that my tech clients are more likely to use my services than my SSH (social sciences) sometimes. 1) They tend to have more money and 2) The tend to value human intervention in editing 'differently' (I hesitate to say more - it's not that much of a binary...) than SSH who have sometimes inaccurate concepts of the tech aspect. That said, the peer publication area is feeling the squeeze. It's an industry built on publications published, not publications read and/or found useful. Open science is trying to address this but it's hard to break the model upon which so many careers have been / are being built.